Here's what I know:
- This semester is the semester of ridiculous testing. SAT and AP. It is my job to prepare my students. It is also my job not to step every day on their souls by inflicting myriad reading passages accompanied by brain draining multiple choice questions. How to balance this? What's true for AP is that after all of the AP reading passages we've done, the SAT passages are like kindergarten. So, they don't need that. English 11 on the other hand does need that but wants it the least, for the most part.
- This year's AP students, and actually many English 11, come in with strong rhetorical analysis skills because of the new SAT essay and the tremendous job that English 10 teachers have done in introducing and covering those skills....which means that we can spend less time there and more time on authentic writing. First semester was all about real and expressive writing and inquiry and the personal essay. Second semester should focus on reviewing the rhetorical analysis stuff, but should also move on to what will be especially important for college: synthesis writing a.k.a "the research paper."
- What I want my goal to be with the synthesis writing is to turn the old "term/research paper" on its head and make it waaaaay more meaningful for students. Waaaaay more authentic. I believe it is the big essential learning that is left. When I say that, what is implied is that there are a hundred tiny essential learnings that take place all at once that can't help but be part of what leads students to be able to write the synthesis writing.
- This is where it gets muddy.....there is the timed one that they will be required to do for the AP test and then there is the real stuff where they get to actually engage in the process of inquiry. It feels to me as though what must come first is the real one and then we practice the fake timed one.
- If that was muddy, this next part is like trying to wade through clay. At the same time, I must figure out a meaningful way to teach vocabulary and also read as a class (shoot me now) at the minimum one novel, at the most three. To what end? Exposure? Okay? What works better for me is to probably read and incorporate the writer's notebook during that reading and the independent reading so that they can find a "seed" idea upon which they can formulate a question upon which they can engage in authentic inquiry. And that is good for all kids, AP or not.
- So I'm back at my same question: where do I start?
- Maybe I start by Considering the Lobster (David Foster Wallace) with all students, AP or not. But for English 11, I break it into manageable chunks. And I pull vocab from there. And I incorporate the writer's notebook thinking piece. So, we do this with something small. And then with Brave New World. And we examine the question(s) that Wallace and Huxley probably began with. All the while doing the same with independent reading. And then, and then, and then ......
No comments:
Post a Comment